How they voted

By Matthew Van Dongen

MG 0266.JPGOn the surface your city councillors seemed a co-operative bunch over the past four years, even in the face of obvious controversy.

City manager Chris Murray noted the trend in a look-back speech last month: a “strong majority” of councillors voted together 75 per cent of the time. That’s quite a unified front for a group criticized as being at loggerheads — even dysfunctional — in the previous term.

The suburban-urban taxation divide? Councillors unanimously endorsed a unique area rating compromise.

An unprecedented censure of Mayor Bob Bratina? His worship was the only dissenting vote.

Even on the contentious topic of LRT — at $811 million, the costliest single project ever proposed for Hamilton — an increasingly leery council has twice overwhelmingly voted to move forward. (With 100 per cent provincial funding, of course.)

In reality, a lot of arguing and horse-trading happened behind closed doors before critical votes as councillors sought to quash the perception of a council bitterly divided. But some votes still reflected the differences that come with a council serving a diverse and far-flung population.

The Spectator revisited some of the biggest issues of the term — and a couple stretching further back — to help voters evaluate incumbents on past decisions.

Continue reading at

Comments are closed.

SpecVotes is the 2014 Election blog of The Hamilton Spectator, 44 Frid St., Hamilton, ON L8N 3G3
Accessible Customer Service
Commitment to Accessibility
Corporate Privacy Policy
Corporate Terms & Conditions
@ Copyright 2014 Metroland Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.
%d bloggers like this: